The killing of george floyd and dave chappelle's 8:46
July 11, 2021
On May 25, 2020, the world as we knew it changed. On this day, we all bore witness to the killing of George Floyd by police officer Derek Chauvin, who knelt on Floyd’s neck for nearly nine minutes. For nearly nine minutes we saw George Floyd scream in agony as life slowly left his body. For nearly nine minutes we saw Chauvin’s fellow police officers standby with an insanely misdirected commitment to ‘controlling’ the outrage of the crowd as opposed to regulating their own colleague. It was traumatic. It was cold. It was ruthless, and it was deeply unsettling.
Although we had seen similar instances to this in the past, this felt unequivocally different. Somehow, this felt profoundly personal, and not just to myself, but to millions of people around the world who sobbed, screamed, and spoke as if Floyd was their father, brother, or son. This time, the repercussions were immense. How? The very next day thousands gathered in Minneapolis to express their outrage and pain through protest—shouting “Justice for George Floyd,” “Black Lives Matter,” and “I can’t breathe.” This was followed by countless protests across the world as people from all races harmonized their voices and unified to fight against systemic racism and police brutality. It went from feeling different to being different. The trauma, pain, and emotional fatigue materialized in a way I had never witnessed before; they bubbled for years under the surface until they ruptured and could no longer be contained. We couldn’t be contained. And not we as in just Black people; but we, as in anyone, irrespective of race, creed, or sexuality who has fought against oppression. We, as in anyone who recognizes systemic flaws and desires change, but doesn’t stop at simply desiring it; in their own way—regardless of how small it is—they aid in creating it.
We saw this on June 6, 2020; it was estimated that half a million people joined protests in 550 places across the US. These protests continued for over a month, having taken place in over 2000 cities and towns in all 50 states and over 60 countries. Over a year later I look and see that we haven’t stopped; and we can’t, because if we truly desire an egalitarian society, we must continue to evolve from what currently is.
So, I’ll say it again. This was different; and I want to emphasize this. Here, the killing of George Floyd sent shock waves throughout the world. The earth trembled as our boots marched through the streets; incumbents, institutions, and political structures quaked as we lifted our voices in unison. And our voices, our screams, our cries, echoed and echoed through the wind until we saw something: impact. What is this impact? Being over a year removed from the killing of Floyd, we’ve seen in many cases an earnest desire to be better educated on racism. We’ve seen an increase in Black-led groups, elevated support for Black businesses, and heightened awareness around Black issues; and we’ve seen a renewed commitment by policymakers to address systemic racism and police brutality.
On June 12, 2020, six days after these mass protests, one of the most moving and thought-provoking responses to the death of George Floyd was released. On this day, Dave Chappelle released a special called “8:46”, addressing George Floyd’s death, police brutality, and the ongoing protests at the time. If you haven’t already, I encourage you to watch it. This timely and critical analysis of the events at the time presents a sobering perspective to the conversation of police brutality and the BLM movement. With its impact on the world, and Chappelle’s ability to disrupt the culture through honesty and some satire, I counted it necessary to discuss the critical elements of this special in relation to our conversation on BLM.
When I began to watch the special, I was unsure of what it would be about. The title “8:46” served as rather ambiguous, and to my mind, it failed to provide context as to the direction that the special would take. Nonetheless, Chappelle began his special speaking about a horrifying experience he had. He recalled how in the 90’s (he couldn’t remember the exact year) he was visiting Los Angeles—lounging around at his home, watching a movie about the apocalypse around 4 a.m. This casual and relaxed night took a drastic turn just 30 minutes later, as around 4:30 a.m. he remembered feeling an earthquake, one so massive that he was positive he was going to die. He later learned that this was the Northridge earthquake. Chappelle said that where he was from earthquakes never happened, and in the moment, it was so traumatic that he made a promise to himself that he wouldn’t scream, just so that if he did survive, he wouldn’t recall himself being vocally terrified. From his recollection, this earthquake couldn’t have lasted more than 35 seconds. Due to his uncertainly I decided to do some research to validate his claims. I found that the Northridge earthquake was in 1994 and lasted for 10-20 seconds.
It’s astounding how human perception of space and time during traumatizing events magnifies the experience. It tends to be the case that our perception of time in these scenarios is drawn out, causing us to believe things were longer or worse than they actually were. 35 seconds is what Dave said; but in actuality, it was 10-20 seconds. For 10-20 seconds he was discombobulated and felt like he was going to die. Picture that; and now picture Floyd’s perception of time as he laid on the ground in agony, because for 8 minutes and 46 seconds—what very well may have felt like an eternity to Floyd—he screamed and pleaded as Chauvin casually knelt on his neck despite clear evidence that the he was in dire pain as result of his actions. Up until this point I remained clueless as to what 8:46 signified. But then it became clear; it represented the amount of time it took for life to fully leave George Floyd’s body.
When Chappelle compared his experience during the earthquake, his 10-20 seconds, to the 8 minutes and 46 seconds that Chauvin spent pressing his knee into Floyd’s neck, killing him, he said he couldn’t imagine being in that position for that long. He couldn’t imagine being terrified—vocally screaming for his dead mother. Why would someone call out for their dead mother you ask? Well, Chappelle resolved that he knew he was going to die. He knew he couldn’t breathe. He knew that receiving mercy in this position was idealistic and fantastical; and he knew that police officers and the Black community were largely at odds. And so, his last moments were spent screaming and watching Derek Chauvin’s fellow police officers, Thomas Lane, Tou Thao, and J. Alexander Kueng, stand by with their hands in their pockets as he died, in part, due to their lack of desire to intervene. I’ve found this to be baffling. It truly baffles me that they were unwilling to exercise compassion and humanity when the situation was clearly under control. It baffles me that his cries fell on deaf ears for nearly nine minutes, and as a result, Floyd stopped breathing with two minutes left in the video. He laid there, motionless in the street as Chauvin continued to press his knee into his neck.
On June 1st, the medical examiners final findings indicated that Floyd’s heart stopped while he was being restrained and ultimately ruled his death a homicide. Not only did the knee on his neck kill him, but it was also because of the two officers who pinned him down by applying pressure on his back. To this Chappelle said, “Who do you think you are, to think that this would happen and you wouldn’t feel the wrath of God?
“Who do you think you are, to think that this would happen and you wouldn’t feel the wrath of God?”
Chappelle also spoke about Candace Owens who disparaged Floyd’s character, asking the world “who made him a hero”? Hearing this, I decided to search for her words myself. I found that Candace Owens was completely misled as to what this reaction from the Black community was about. From her video, Candace Owens stated that she doesn’t “support George Floyd and the media’s depiction of him as a martyr for black America.” She explained how Black people are unique because “we demand support for people in our community who are up to no good.” Notably, she did mention that being a criminal doesn’t mean he deserved to die; however, she went on to say that she refuses to accept this narrative that “this is the best the Black community has to offer,” and that the Black community has been turning criminals into heroes overnight. She followed these statements by saying that Floyd wasn’t an “amazing person,” although he is being portrayed as one. She further pointed to his criminal past, stating that he spent five years in prison for robbery and assault charges and that he was a violent criminal, as he reportedly beat a pregnant woman and threatened to kill her baby.
In viewing this video, my perspective was that Candace Owens possesses a misguided perception of the public outrage, and has distorted the reality of Black people who have died at the hands of the police, and specifically Floyd. It further perpetuated some false narratives and irrational ideologies not only around Floyd, but also around those that innocently die at the hands of police officers at large. The notion that Floyd was a violent man stems from his criminal record (namely an aggravated robbery) and a picture of a woman who was violently beaten which surfaced on the internet a couple of weeks after Floyd’s death. It’s true that Floyd served 5 years in prison in 2009 for aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon. However, there were no reports of Floyd assaulting anyone, especially not a pregnant woman. In terms of the photo that surfaced on the internet, the court records indicate that Aracely Henriquez was the woman on the receiving end of the aggravated robbery. However, the pictures that surfaced were of another woman named Andrea Sicignano who shared her story in 2018, indicating that she was sexually assaulted in Madrid.
Owens’ ideas that the Black community demands support for people who are up to no good, that Floyd was a criminal, that we have made him a martyr, and that there is a narrative that this is the “best” Black community has to offer muddies the basis for the outrage, and in some cases is blatantly false. Yes, the police were called because George Floyd allegedly gave a store clerk a counterfeit $20. Yes, George Floyd went to prison in 2009. But how does this relate to the fact that he died as a result of police brutality? What’s more, what relevance does his criminal past have to his actions in this moment? Needless to say, using counterfeit money is illegal, and is thus indicative of participating in criminal activity. But the issue is there is a stark difference between knowingly and unknowingly possessing counterfeit money, and to this day it remains unclear whether Floyd knew if the $20 was counterfeit or not. The cashier, Christopher Martin, who received the money from Floyd said he knew the money was fake, but initially believed Floyd genuinely never knew it was counterfeit. His perception later changed to being unsure about Floyd’s knowledge of the bill, but there was never a strong conviction that Floyd knew. Martin even spoke to Floyd, telling him that the store owner wanted to speak to him. Martin said that his interaction with Floyd wasn’t aggressive and that he seemed very friendly and approachable. Floyd never ran away after he used the money. He stayed.
Without the knowledge of whether Floyd knew if the money was counterfeit or not, it’s simply irresponsible to suggest that Floyd was “up to no good” or is a criminal. What’s more, intentionally committing crimes in the past shouldn’t be seen as an indication that other unrelated illegal activities are also intentional (but it can be assumed if there is a pattern). This may have very well been a case of ignorance; yet, due to Floyd’s criminal past there was this proclivity to assume that he was certainly committing a crime. But how do we know? And why shouldn’t we assume the opposite? There rests this idea in society that after one has atoned for their crimes that they’re still a criminal regardless of what they do, and irrespective of an active desire and attempt to change their lives. But my understanding of being a criminal is an individual who knowingly continues to participate in criminal activity; not one who has bettered their lives, becoming a moral citizen, contributing value to society; and not one who unknowingly gets caught up in criminal activity. Unless one abides by the essentialist ideology of “once a criminal, always a criminal,” in this case, I deem Floyd’s criminal history to be just that: history. He was punished for his crimes, and by many accounts he was actively making strides to change his life. Why wasn’t this point used to naturally assume that he wasn’t up to no good?
It’s easy for our privilege to be personally unrecognized, and I say this as a general statement, not one related to race. But in being privileged and not recognizing it, it’s also easy to cast judgement on decisions you may never understand because you’ve never been in a position of pure desperation, nor in an environment that fosters bad decisions. This doesn’t mean that criminal activity shouldn’t be punished and that people shouldn’t be held responsible for their actions. But it does mean that empathy and context are essential. So, we support people who are “up to no good” because many of us understand doing anything to survive, and we aren’t demanding support for people who were up to no good. We’re demanding justice for people who were killed unjustifiably. There’s a difference, and a counterfeit $20 surely doesn’t sign a death warrant. Knowing this, the background of Floyd—whether you deem him to be a criminal or not—is irrelevant to his killing, and to introduce that point demonizes Floyd and implicitly suggests that we shouldn’t care. What does this all mean? It means that Floyd isn’t a martyr, he’s a symbol. It also means that we didn’t make Floyd a martyr. A martyr is commonly defined as someone killed because of their beliefs. But George Floyd—George Floyd was killed because they didn’t care. They didn’t listen. So yes, he is a symbol. And they made him the symbol by killing him unjustifiably and horrifically. We simply responded.
Black lives matter.
Check out Dave Chappelle’s special:
Interested in donating to support BLM more? Donate to these organizations:
- Home – Black Lives Matter
- BLACK LIVES MATTER CANADA
- The Jamaican Canadian Association | Donate (micharity.com)
- Fundraiser by BLACK LIVES MATTER TORONTO : COVID-19 Black Emergency Support Fund (gofundme.com)
- Donate Now – WOMEN’S HEALTH IN WOMEN’S HANDS (canadahelps.org)
- No Justice No Peace – Page Not Found (blacklivesmatter.ca)
- Fundraiser by STRAPPED TO : Toronto Protestor Bail Fund (gofundme.com)
- BLACK BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION (BBPA) | Charity Profile | Donate Online | Canadahelps
- Eritrean-Ethiopian COVID Solidarity Fund | Chuffed | Non-profit charity and social enterprise fundraising